 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for August 2002 |
 |
| 231 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:27:12 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
|
A more intelligent response than Lomborg's (not an
argument for denial and non-action) was just publsihed by the World Bank
(an org. not usually known for its prudence).
See below...
Published on Thursday, August
22, 2002 in the Guardian of London
| |
|
Act Now, World Bank Urges Earth Summit
Growth must not
come at price to planet, report warns
by Charlotte Denny and Larry
Elliott
A four-fold increase in the size of the world economy over
the next 50 years will come at the expense of water shortages, rising
pollution, dysfunctional cities and growing civic unrest, unless
international leaders take urgent action at next week's World
Summit on Sustainable Development, the World Bank warned last night.
In a stark message to the heads of state preparing to fly to
Johannesburg, the bank said decisions must be taken over the next
few years to halt the destruction of the environment and to share
the benefits of economic growth more fairly to prevent its
dystopian vision of the future becoming a reality.
"Action is
required now - even for problems that will unfold over a longer
period," said Jim Wolfensohn, the bank's president.
Fears that the
10-day summit will be a talking shop light on action have been
heightened in recent days by the decision of President George Bush not
to attend. Without the leader of the economy which consumes the
largest share of the world's resources, green lobbyists are worried
that the follow-up conference to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit will end
with no real progress.
Tony Blair will only be at the summit for
24 hours, although Britain is sending four other ministers, including
the deputy prime minister, John Prescott.
The issues on the
table at Johannesburg - water shortages, global warming, bio-diversity
and poverty - all require urgent decisions, the bank said in its
annual world development report.
By 2050, the output of the world
economy could have quadrupled in value to $140 trillion a year. While
green activists argue that the environment cannot sustain human
consumption on this scale, the Bank argues that a growing world
economy is essential for lifting billions of people out of poverty and
that it can be married with sustainable use of limited resources.
"If we are going to conquer poverty we have to have growth, and at
a serious rate," said Nick Stern, the bank's chief economist. "If
that is sustained over the next 50 years and environmental issues
are not addressed, growth will be derailed."
The bank says
that, despite the 2bn increase in the world's population over the last
30 years, there have been significant gains in human welfare.
"But the development path has left a legacy of accumulated
environmental and social problems which cannot be repeated," said
Mr Wolfensohn.
Humans are changing the world's climate,
threatening coastal and island populations with rising sea levels and
residents of semi-arid areas with desertification, according to the
bank.
Hundreds of cities in developing countries have unhealthy
air, causing premature deaths that would be preventable at a modest
cost.
Developing countries are doing more to address cross-border
environmental problems than industrialized countries did when they
were at comparable stages of development, but, the bank said, lack
of cash was forcing unnecessary trade-offs, generating
environmental stresses.
"The key is to act now to initiate
virtuous rather than vicious circles - to create constituencies for
sustainability, not for environmental degradation and social
polarization," the report said.
Two-thirds of the world's
population will be living in cities by 2050, the bank predicted, and
the demands of such vast urban conglomerates for housing, water and
supplies will be vast.
But with better environmental standards and
more efficient economic growth, the needs of the world's new cities
can be managed, the Bank said.
"By thinking long term and
acting now, we can take advantage of these windows of opportunity to
shift development to a more inclusive and sustainable path," the
report said.
(c) Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:06
AM
Subject: RE: [GBlist] Environmentalists
Are Wrong: Sustainability, Global warming, Economic analyses
I
know, it will be so much easier to just go to the mall and
shop.
whew, is that
good news. i was getting tired of being an environmentalist
anyhow........
d
|
 |
 |
|