|
January 16, 2001
Jim
Thanks for the comeback of last night.
I would like to respond to the "sounds expensive
part"
If you consider that only what is considered a "
waste" material is used for charcoal. Forest companies in B.C. replant where
they log, so this is a renewable resource. From internet studies we see that
sometimes as much as 30 % of the char product is lost to burning. With our
closed system ( Very little to no air getting to the charcoal) The burning
problem has been eliminated. In terms of
the gasses, as I mentioned before, the condensable
are turned into solids, and sold. The non-condensable, are rerouted into the
burn chamber and used as axillery fuel. We have added a air system with the N-C
gas to force the CO into the burner. With the right mix of air, the CO should
burn. So in term of using renewable feed stock, our expected char return, saving
the wood oil, burning the N-C gas, and most important, the benefits to our
precious Globe. I believe our plant will be the most environmentally friendly
charcoal plant anywhere.
The following are the expected products of
combustion. Note, only because we don't have any charcoal to use as fuel for
start-up, we are using a light oil burner. This will be changed to a charcoal
burner when we have product.
NCG Combustion
---------------------------------------------------------------
Heat
Generated
212 Kw
Air
Required
369 SCFM
CO2 16.7
%
CO
100ppm
SO2
12 ppm
NOx 100ppm
Oil Burner
------------------------------------------------------------------
Heat
Generated
63Kw
Air
required
35SCFM
CO2
12.6 %
CO
40ppm
SO2
17ppm
NOx
80 ppm
Combined Flue Gas from Stack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume 450
SCFM
Temrature
400 C
Velocity 3.5
M/S
CO2
16 %
CO 96
ppm
SO2
12 ppm
NOx 96
ppm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Scientist that did the numbers,
and the Professional Engineer that put this all together for me, and I
quote
The emissions will fall within the acceptable
regulatory limits
Respectfully John
Flottvik
|