REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for January 2001
54 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:30:30 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Charcoal



January 16, 2001
 
Jim
 
Thanks for the comeback of last night.
 
I would like to respond to the "sounds expensive part"
 
If you consider that only what is considered a " waste" material is used for charcoal. Forest companies in B.C. replant where they log, so this is a renewable resource. From internet studies we see that sometimes as much as 30 % of the char product is lost to burning. With our closed system ( Very little to no air getting to the charcoal) The burning problem has been eliminated. In terms of
the gasses, as I mentioned before, the condensable are turned into solids, and sold. The non-condensable, are rerouted into the burn chamber and used as axillery fuel. We have added a air system with the N-C gas to force the CO into the burner. With the right mix of air, the CO should burn. So in term of using renewable feed stock, our expected char return, saving the wood oil, burning the N-C gas, and most important, the benefits to our precious Globe. I believe our plant will be the most environmentally friendly charcoal plant anywhere.
 
The following are the expected products of combustion. Note, only because we don't have any charcoal to use as fuel for start-up, we are using a light oil burner. This will be changed to a charcoal burner when we have product.
 
                 NCG Combustion
                      
---------------------------------------------------------------
Heat Generated                       212 Kw
Air Required                          369 SCFM
CO2                                        16.7 %
CO                                        100ppm
SO2                                       12 ppm
NOx                                       100ppm
 
                  Oil Burner
------------------------------------------------------------------
Heat Generated                        63Kw
Air required                              35SCFM
CO2                                        12.6 %
CO                                           40ppm
SO2                                         17ppm
NOx                                         80 ppm
 
 Combined Flue Gas from Stack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume                                    450 SCFM
Temrature                                400 C
Velocity                                   3.5 M/S
CO2                                        16 %
CO                                          96 ppm
SO2                                        12 ppm
NOx                                        96 ppm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
According to the Scientist that did the numbers, and the Professional Engineer that put this all together for me, and I quote
The emissions will fall within the acceptable regulatory limits
 
  Respectfully       John Flottvik

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Charcoal
      • From: "*.English" <english@adan.kingston.net>