Tami Bond wrote: (snip) > I've seen the $220 CO monitor that Harmon posted yesterday. That is the > one with 10-minute response time. One advantage is its ability to record > the data. > I haven't seen this in action, but the website says: "The logger’s sampling rate is user-selectable from 1/2 second up to 9 hours." So I was assuming that it had a 1/2 second response time -- is that not correct? Still, this unit is not ideal. It's $220, plus $95 for the software and cable to use with it, so still a bit pricey. Especially when I see CO2 sensors which are much, much cheaper. Seems a bit strange that CO would be that much harder to detect than CO2, but what do I know? -- Harmon Seaver CyberShamanix http://www.cybershamanix.com - Stoves List Archives and Website: http://www.crest.org/discussion/stoves/current/ http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Stoves.html Stoves List Moderators: Ron Larson, ronallarson@qwest.net Alex English, english@adan.kingston.net Elsen L. Karstad, elk@wananchi.com www.chardust.com List-Post: <mailto:stoves@crest.org> List-Help: <mailto:stoves-help@crest.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stoves-unsubscribe@crest.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:stoves-subscribe@crest.org> Sponsor the Stoves List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html - Other Biomass Stoves Events and Information: http://www.bioenergy2002.org http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/ http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/carbon.shtml For information about CHAMBERS STOVES http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Chamber.htm
