 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Stoves Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 240 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:23 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
|
Dear Ron,
Don O'Neal who is in charge of the HELPS, International molded cement
griddle stove project in Guatemala writes:
"I agree with standardizing on pot size and shape in order to
compare data. I would encourage however a larger pot containing at least one
and a half gallons of water. My point is that it be sufficiently large
to average out short term variation in wood and fire tending. Also it
is about the size of actual cooking pots in the field."
I have just finished a series of tests at Aprovecho. We use 5 pounds of
water because using less water biases the test toward the lowest mass, quickest
responding stove which may in fact be burning wood quickly. In the 12 tests just
done although we found a range of boiling times to be between 12 and 19 minutes
the efficiencies after burning 1.5 pounds of wood were closely packed, 22% to
26%. Some of the slower responding stoves burned slower and closed the gap as
the pot was simmering. Don suggests that we use 1.5 gallons of water. I believe
as well that a larger amount of water is better and it allows the higher mass
stove material to get hot and become more efficient. A longer test is more like
boiling, beans, corn for tortillas, etc.
Tom, I agree with you that the test should reflect how people cook. In
Don's experience people in Central America use big pots and larger amounts of
water. One litre seems more suited to backpackers, etc. But really any
reasonable test would be better than the confusion that now exists. Apples and
oranges...Tower of babble...
By the way, here is our test procedure:
Procedure: Weigh water and wood (5 lbs. of water (2265g), and 1.5 lbs.
wood (680 grams). Kiln dried Douglas Fir is cut into pieces 18" X 5/8"
X 1/2" except for one 18" piece which is split finer to provide
kindling for starting fire. Prepare fire and place uncovered steel pot (9 inch
diameter by 5 inches high) on stove. Place all 8 probes while stove is at room
temperature. Begin recording. One minute after recording has begun, light fire.
Once fire is going, feed sticks into fire five at a time, burning at the tips
and pushed into fire as consumed. Continue recording until 7620 seconds after
test is initiated. Make note on file of: date; test number and description (for
example: 3rd Pico test, 2nd using adobe brick); weight of wood used; weight of
water used; time from lighting fire until boiling; water remaining at end of
test; time when last wood was fed into firebox, and weight of charcoal produced.
Also note any inconsistencies in procedure.
We assign a pound of wood 8,600 BTU's. And figure that it takes 1005 BTU's to
boil off a pound of water. The amount of BTU's that made it into the pot
(sensible plus latent) over the amount of BTU's in the wood gives us a
percentage. We don't count BTU's that heated the pot or made remaining ash,
coals, etc.
But, I'm not looking for us to agree on every part of the test protocol,
although that would be really great. Just agreeing on the pot size and weight of
water will be a major advance. Hopefully folks publish their test protocols and
we can make adjustments.
Hope we can make this happen! Onward to good science!
Best,
Dean
|
 |
 |
|