REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for January 2002
240 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:21 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trade names, patents



 Dear Mr. Stubbing, 
       I am in a peculiar spot where my devices of consideration will be 
constantly developed over a great period of time.  Very little cash flow may 
result from early development. I will manage the patent process by all of the 
means necessary to establish proprietary rights as I go on what I really need 
to.
         Probably I will do the large part of the search process myself at 
great expense in time and effort.  I make less per hour than the patent 
attorney I would hire.  I happen to be in a position to know more than most 
average guys (which is still woefully inadequate) about the patent process 
and my devises.  My friends and family have had experience here.  Inventors 
should know they can do this themselves. 
       My string of sometimes political letters is an effort to call 
attention to the plight of an ordinary guy who does not understand the 
complexity of the process.  I also am constantly disappointed in stories I 
hear from local inventors that have had bad experiences with the system.  
Dayton, Ohio, USA is among the most inventive towns in the world.  Shouldn't 
we encourage this? 
       Large Corporations have clearly tilted the patent process against the 
unknowledgable small guy.  I am disappointed in the fact that with today's 
technology, the patent process cannot be more user friendly, and fair. 
        So inventor beware! 
        One common technique I have heard of is this: A large corporation 
obtains exclusive license on a patent, and then does not develop it until the 
patent has expired.  This prevents the competition from using the devise, as 
well as the inventor from collecting a single royalty check. 
        What is the defense of a small one devise inventor, that believes he 
is in for a good ride here, only to find he has been kidnapped?  Who really 
benefits from this stupidity? 
       My aim is to stimulate open debate both for my own information, and to 
call attention to any fixes which could be prescribed.  You could say I'm 
playing "devils advocate" for the little guy.  All with experience or 
knowledge are welcome to comment.  
       
  Thank you for your input. 
                                    Daniel Dimiduk 

-
Stoves List Archives and Website:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/stoves/current/
http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Stoves.html

Stoves List Moderators:
Ron Larson, ronallarson@qwest.net
Alex English, english@adan.kingston.net
Elsen L. Karstad, elk@wananchi.com www.chardust.com

List-Post: <mailto:stoves@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stoves-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stoves-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:stoves-subscribe@crest.org>

Sponsor the Stoves List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Biomass Stoves Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/carbon.shtml

For information about CHAMBERS STOVES
http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Chamber.htm