REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for March 2002
66 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:31 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: low power efficiency




---- Forwarded message
From: emma@george.as
To: dstill@epud.net
CC: Visser@btg.ct.utwente.nl
Date: 28 Feb 2002 18:09:21 -0000
Subject: low power efficiency

Some of you gave me some advice on testing lorena and other woodstoves a couple 
of 
months ago. I have one more question.

I want to test some woodstoves also at low power, but it seems (to me) that 
efficiency at low (min. for boiling) power is a meaningless concept. In my mind 
I am not testing the stoves alone, but the Stove-pot-lid combo. In an ideal 
system no power would be required to keep a pot simmering, the power supplied 
by the wood is simply to compensate for losses in the system. An insulated box 
could do the same with no input.

If, on the other hand, I simmer without a lid (to measure inevitable evaporated 
water) a higher than realistic power will be required to maintain simmering. 

The only option remaining is to calculate energy loss (radiative, conductive 
etc) from the system which seems impossibly complex and pretty dodgy, and it's 
not really efficiency anyway - the energy can't be used in any situation.- 
Although I fully accept that steam produced in a high power test could 
correspond to useful power in a cooking situation.

I think I'm going to give up, and just find the savings compared to a 3-stone 
fire instead. Or I could give a combined high-low power efficiency, as in the 
VITA tests, eg. boil for 30 mins, simmer for 60. But since the low power phase 
represents only energy lost, not energy used, the longer the simmering 
(compared to high power boiling) the lower the efficiency. 

So the fair thing would be to simulate cooking, where no time should be spent 
high-power boiling, only heating and then simmering, with a lid. Then the 
useful energy corresponds only to that needed to bring the water to the boil??

It's very possible I've misunderstood something obvious. Could you advise?!

many thanks
Emma

-- 
Get your firstname@lastname email at http://Nameplanet.com/?su



-- 
Get your firstname@lastname email at http://Nameplanet.com/?su

-
Stoves List Archives and Website:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/stoves/200202/
http://crest.org/discussiongroups/resources/stoves/ (Under construction)
http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Stoves.html (Original)

Stoves List Moderators:
Ron Larson, ronallarson@qwest.net
Alex English, english@adan.kingston.net
Elsen L. Karstad, elk@wananchi.com www.chardust.com

List-Post: <mailto:stoves@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stoves-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stoves-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:stoves-subscribe@crest.org>

Sponsor the Stoves List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Biomass Stoves Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1010424940_7.html Bioenergy
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975339_7.html Gasification
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975672_7.html Carbon

For information about CHAMBERS STOVES
http://www.ikweb.com/enuff/public_html/Chamber.htm