REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for March 2002
66 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:31 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: low power efficiency



In a message dated 3/8/02 5:24:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, adkarve@pn2.vsnl.net.in writes:

  >Reply in text

Subj:Re: low power efficiency
Date:3/8/02 5:24:05 PM Eastern Standard Time
From:adkarve@pn2.vsnl.net.in
To:tami.bond@noaa.gov
CC:stoves@crest.org
Sent from the Internet



Dear Ms Bond,
the discussion so far shows that the boiling and evaporation test that we
have so far been conducting, gives us just that, i.e. efficiency of boiling
and evaporating water. It does not really reflect the cooking efficiency of
a stove, which is operated in many different ways. One of the standard
procedures in cooking anything is to bring the water to a boil, then cover
the pot, reduce the flame and just allow the pot to simmer.  Experience with
solar cookers and also with the hot box show, that one does not even require
a temperature of 100 degrees Celsius for cooking.  With the pot just
simmering, there would be very little evaporation, and, as you have rightly
mentioned, the efficiency of the stove would be near zero, and yet the
cooking process would be completed with very little fuel. Therefore, the
test that has been recommended by the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy
Sources, Government of India,  requires the tester to keep a series of
standard pots ready, filled with a certain constant amount of water. The pot
is covered with a lid. As soon as water in one pot reaches a certain
temperature, say 90 or 95 degrees, one takes it down and sets the next pot
on the stove.  In this way, only the rise in temperature of the water is
taken into account and not the amount of water evaporated. One has to make
some allowance for the conductivity of the metal of the pot, because heat
would be lost through the surface of the pot.
A.D.Karve

   > Along this same lines a tester could be constructed consisting of a larger tank of water at a pre-determined temperature.  The water could be circulated through a sealed test pot with a closed lid by gravity to another pot over time.  The temperature and volume of the lower tank could then be measured.
       Along these same lines, a single tank of known volume could be plumbed to a sealed pot with a recirculating pump. At the end of the experiment the pot would be drained into the tank and the temperature of the tank measured.
       This is a method of measuring solar heat storage so I'm sure it would work fine with a stove.
       Daniel  Dimiduk.