REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for May 2002
102 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:38 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Short primer on stove efficiencies



Dear Dean,

As usual, you hit the nail on the head.
Clean combustion as well as good heat transfer to the pan will be a compromise. You need sufficient residence time (temperature dependent) for the fuel to burn completely. Having a large combustion space brings with it the danger of heat loss to the surroundings, so good insulation would help. After the chemistry has completed, the gases can be exposed to the cold pan bottom. Velocity increased heat transfer so a chimney will help. If a chimney is placed downstream from the pan, a gas tight seal between the pan and the stove is essential.



At 07:04 6/05/02 -0700, you wrote:
Dear Kirk, et al
 snip.
If I were to play devil's advocate I would be tempted to suggest that massive, box type combustion chambers that encourage loading with too much fuel are obsolete and since they are not clean burning should not be matched up with heat transfer strategies that require better systems of combustion. A box made from thermal mass is just not a modern combustion chamber.
 
Best,
 
Dean

Exactly.

Piet