REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for August 2002
145 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:45 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Roundup of the Last Roundup...



Dear All for the Last Time:
 
Even though it is largely peripheral, I have enjoyed the discussion of Roundup utility and toxicity here on the list. 
 
One problem not mentioned is dosage and amount used.
 
Water, properly applied, is necessary for crop growth.  Improperly applied it causes floods and erosion.  Should we therefore give it up?
 
Farmers, finding that fertilizers are effective, have often overused them, resulting in heavy runoff and eutrofication of lakes.  Does that mean that all farmers should abandon all fertilizers? NO
 
I have used Roundup selectively and carefully with no ill effects around my garden.  I'm glad to hear the price will come down and I'll use it a bit more, but not poison the whole business.  (Thanks to Harmon for example of overuse;  Thanks to Crispin for examples of necessary use.)
 
So, we need to use chemicals carefully, but not ban them.  As we Humans get cleverer, we need to get wiser. 
 
END OF DISCUSSION I HOPE.   
 
TOM REED                                                                       
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Crispin
To: Stoves
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: FYI: Roundup (and risks)

Dear Dan
 
I would like you to know that of all the people who contributed to the list in the past year that I have subscribed, your contributions both to the group and to me privately have been some of the most practical and useful in a developing country.
 
Your understanding of heat exchange and minimizing the space required to get the heat out of a hot gas flow has been, in my estimation, better than anyone else on the list.  I have tried to extend the reach of your knowledge by sharing what you have taught me with others.
 
It is my opinion that this list is not the place for a discussion of Roundup unless it relates to air quality from burning plants that have been treated with it in such a way that its normal rapid breakdown has been delayed and some harmful chemicals may be formed in the combustion, whether theoretically or actually.
 
I agree with your assessment of real risks and point out that if someone roasts a little meat over some charcoal they bought locally and it had a single branch of a Tambuti tree in it, the person eating the meat would drop dead.  That is a real risk with immediate consequences.  The chances of a person here using Roundup and 'contaminating' some biomass while also introducing some process that prevented the Roundup from breaking down as it normally does, and then cooking something in a semi-closed environment and getting poisoned in a way by the smoke that affected their health is about the same risk (or lower) than the chances of my winning the lottery or gaining recognition for my work.
 
Arguments in favour of taking extreme measures to prevent chemical contamination are frequently based on thinking that is highly theoretical and narrow.  As measurements have improved, we can find all sorts of chemicals in the oceans and lakes in parts per trillion.  These 'risks' are probably or possibly quantifiable, but the discussion of them all too often ignores far greater risks that occur quite naturally.  There is no "clean green meal" out there in the bundu.
 
Being informed of and not being forced to accept any particular risk is, I feel, a reasonable right, so it is good to know what is out there, however a discussion about taking real (especially expensive) action should keep in mind the universe of risk to which people are subjected.
 
The main threat to health in Swaziland is HIV/AIDS, fusareum roseum mould on the food (aflatoxin and zearalenone), measles and alcohol consumption.  Cigarette smoking, which is the direct cause of death of about 85% of smokers, is a real hazard and highly preventable.  Agricultural chemicals are not very high on any list of dangers in spite of the dreadful manner in which they are handled (in my view).  Cotton is a dangerous thing to grow, as are oranges, because of the chemicals, and sugar cane to a lesser extent. 
 
Roundup and any possible, theoretical effect of it on cooking fumes are pretty near the bottom of a list of threats to the people here.  Perhaps if they used it they would have more to eat and be far healthier.
 
Regards
Crispin