REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Stoves Archive for October 2002
236 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:31:57 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

GAS-L: Re: History of very small true gasifier units



On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:09:19 -0500, "Paul S. Anderson"
<psanders@ilstu.edu> wrote:

>My comment and question:  Just because it is top-lit does not make it a 
>gasifier. 

In neither of the two quote you gave was gasifier mentioned, I suspect
both Crispin and (I know) myself deliberately avoided the term. Tom
Reed has posted a very likely reason why people are happy their
devices be termed gasifiers. 


>There would need to be air intentionally entering at the bottom, 
>to come up through the biomass (straw), and create gases specifically to be 
>flared later (milli-seconds or longer) when secondary air is intentionally 
>introduced.

This is how the idd stove "works", an ordinary updraught stove behaves
similarly. The idd better controls the offgas production and enables a
better match with secondary air.

>
>I suspect that the "can with straw" did NOT have air entering at the 
>bottom, but because the straw is so much like loose paper, the air from the 
>top that could reach the burning zone was providing sufficient primary air 
>AND simultaneously providing the secondary air needed to get the flame.

I very much doubt this under natural draught with no chimney.
>
>Anyone with further (and first hand) information about the "can with straw" 
>combustion unit, please send it to me (via Stoves List is best so that all 
>can comment.)  (I am sending this also to the "Gasification List Serve" for 
>comments from that perspective.)

I have honoured your xpost this time, I consider it a stoves related
matter.

>
>Also, I refer to my previous posting of 3 days ago about "Theory and 
>terminology questions about combustion".  Not a single comment from anyone yet.

I was giving Tom Reed first refusal :-)

AJH

Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation,  tombreed@attbi.com Biomass =
Energy Foundation, www.woodgas.com
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>
-
Gasification List Archives http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/200202/
Bioenergy 2002 http://www.bioenergy2002.org/
200 kWe CHP Discussion
http://crest.org/discussiongroups/resources/gasification/200kWCHP.html
Gasification Reference http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975339_7.html

>