REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Strawbale Archive for February 2001
184 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:41:37 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SB: California Energy Standards



> b. amount of insulation
> required in new home construction in terms of R-Value.

  http://www.ornl.gov/roofs+walls/insulation/ins_16.html

Not sure how accurate it is wrt locations, but the suggested R-value of
49 for the desert area where we hope to build keeps SB high on our list.
Now if we can just satisfy ourselves on the settling, cracking, and
structural issues for liquifaction-prone earthquake country...

> I keep hearing this "California among lowest energy users on per capita
> basis,"  and although this might be true [due to mild seasons and lack
> of heavy industries], I suspect if you moved all those Californians'
> homes to Montana, they would become the highest energy users in US.

Uh, sure. Maybe even if you moved us Californians into Montana-built
homes ;)

                     - Thomas