REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Strawbale Archive for May 2001
199 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:41:49 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SB: A new Tie down method for SB ???




I'm thinking of a pipe at either end of the loops,  and then work  the twist
up the strands, so you can use the length of the pipe for leverage.  I
haven't seen any State guide lines on "tie down" in Australia. I'm more
concerned that the strand under pressure may shear / tear through the
concrete slab but >150 mm  would probably hold up . Needs some testing, I
guess.  The other issue is how to get the interior loop reasonably placed,
as I don't want to have to come in to the wall, and nor do I want to be too
far under the bale and cut in on the base plate

Dom 


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Ted Shelton 
	Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 11:06 AM
	To:	Domingo.Pacot@team.telstra.com
	Subject:	Re: SB: A new Tie down method for SB ???

	     I like your idea. working with high tensile is hard as the loop
gets 
	tight. would there be a problem with kinks? What about codes and
state 
	guidelines? I really like the idea on the "cheap" part. would a
sharp 
	bend,(as the wire folded up against the wall) cause a weak point?
	_________________________________________________________________
	Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
   <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>

or for the digest to:
   <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>

Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org