REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Strawbale Archive for November 2001
244 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:42:25 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SB: Re: CLAY SOIL



Sgrìobh Robert W. Tom:

>All that being said, I think that a Rubble Trench Foundation (RTF) 
>would be worth
>considering  (rendering my second statement incorrect).
>
>RTFs , unlike monolithic foundations,  are inherently able to withstand the
>destructive forces which frost activity can impart.

     I have a fondness for rubble trench foundations, since my house 
sits on one.  Our frost depth here is five feet.  I don't think that 
I would go so deep with a rubble trench foundation again.  It depends 
a lot on what you're digging through.  In my rocky, silty soil the 
trench had a tendency to cave in at the edges, and it had to be much 
wider than I had planned in order to get the big rocks out.  (I had 
some very, very big rocks.)

     On the other hand, if you have clay soil without large rocks, 
that might be pretty good for a narrow, clean, easily-filled trench. 
So it's worth taking a look, as Rob suggests.

-Speireag.
-- 
To face death, live.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
   <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>

or for the digest to:
   <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>

Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org