 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Strawbale Archive for February 2002 |
 |
| 156 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:42:38 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
SB: Re: Clear Skies OT Apologies
This is my understanding of the new policy based on listening to
his speech and proposals. The core of his proposal is not to
restrict industry with a blanket policy or regulation (it does not
work) or to mandate conservation (ask Californians if it works,
the only reason demand dropped in Cali was because of the prices
for electricity, supply and demand and all that) but to promote
through tax credits and government grants the development of clean
technologies. No he does not dictate what technologies. Doing so
would defeat the purpose. In a free society you state what needs
to be done, stand back, and be amazed at the results. For this
capitalism must be allowed to freely flourish. Countries who have
tried otherwise have failed. I know. I served for a decade in the
intra german border. After the fall of the wall i drove to the
eastern side. It was like traveling to an alternate dimension. The
polution, dirt and decay in the former comunist germany was
apaling. I have also traveled to "free" but underdeveloped
countries. And please do not begin the rant about under developed
countries been the fault of the US. This countries tax payers give
more money to help in their development than all other countries
combined. These under developed countries are cesspools of
pollution. Don believe me? try drinking the water in most south
american or central american countries.
So how do you clean up the environment? BY making it profitable.
Siemens will only develop a better solar panel if they can sell
it. Plug powers fuel cells or Electric fuels zero emision bus will
only be a reality if they can find buyers. Only wealthy countries
can make this happen. That is the core problem with Kyoto an all
other treaties. It attempts to place restrictions that would
destroy a rich countries ability to clean the environment. By its
implementation you take away the only true way to solve the
problem. OK enough of my rant. bottom line, want to clean the
environment? Make it profitable.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Huff 'n' Puff Constructions" <huffnpuff@shoal.net.au>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:23:37 +1100
>G ' day Balers
>
>Apologies in advance for this off topic subject but I need some
observations
>from the other side of the world to assist my thinking. So if
you do not
>want to read further, and I will keep it short, 'the delete key
is your best
>friend'. I do not want to start any wars here just want the
truth if
>possible and reply to me off list if you prefer to, so as we do
not take up
>other peoples' band width on an off topic subject.
>
>Just heard on the Aussie radio, George W. Bush speaking about the
new USA
>policy on the environment called "Clear Skies". Sounds like he
has got his
>act together, at first glance, saving 4.9 million American jobs
and some 400
>billion dollars in lost economy if theUSA and (Australia) had
adopted the
>Kyoto Protocol. Just also heard litle Johnnie Howard, our Prime
Minister,
>supporting George W. on this idea.
>
>Must be something wrong somewhere, what does he mean by Clear
Skies? Does
>this mean nuclear power? Can someone please help me as I am in
the middle of
>preparing the bones of the agenda for the International SB
Conference 2002.
>One of the streams that we are promoting for the conference is
sustainable
>energy consumption for the built environment.
>
>Cannot find anything on my search engine on Clear Skies re George
W. Thanks
>for your help in advance and my apologies once again but you are
the only mob
>I can get any sense out of or should I say truth out of.
>
>Kind regards The Straw Wolf
>http://strawbale.archinet.com.au
>61 2 6927 6027
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
> <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>
>
>or for the digest to:
> <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>
>
>Please send any list administration questions to
>strawbale-owner@crest.org
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
<strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>
or for the digest to:
<strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>
Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org
 |
 |
|