REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Strawbale Archive for April 2002
195 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:42:55 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

SB: Hybrid question



If any of you feel strongly whether this idea is good or bad, I'd sure 
appreciate reading your thoughts.

The design (from the team I've hired), not yet built (or submitted to local 
planning agency)

1.  Bale walls go up first.
2.  Bale walls get super compressed, height measured.
3.  Vertical notches for load-bearing posts get cut in bales, top to bottom.
4.  Posts, exactly the same height as the super compressed wall, are fit 
into the wall.
5.  Roof trusses are fastened to the posts.

Although this may sound like a hybrid, it's simply a not-load bearing SB 
house.  Matching the height of the compressed wall with the posts gets rid 
of the common problem in non-load bearing SB houses:  filling the gaps at 
the top because the bale wall height is never the same height as the roof 
supports.  I could rip out an entire bale wall on this thing and still keep 
the roof up.

Thanks

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
   <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>

or for the digest to:
   <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>

Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org