 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Strawbale Archive for April 2002 |
 |
| 195 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:42:55 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
SB: Hybrid question
If any of you feel strongly whether this idea is good or bad, I'd sure
appreciate reading your thoughts.
The design (from the team I've hired), not yet built (or submitted to local
planning agency)
1. Bale walls go up first.
2. Bale walls get super compressed, height measured.
3. Vertical notches for load-bearing posts get cut in bales, top to bottom.
4. Posts, exactly the same height as the super compressed wall, are fit
into the wall.
5. Roof trusses are fastened to the posts.
Although this may sound like a hybrid, it's simply a not-load bearing SB
house. Matching the height of the compressed wall with the posts gets rid
of the common problem in non-load bearing SB houses: filling the gaps at
the top because the bale wall height is never the same height as the roof
supports. I could rip out an entire bale wall on this thing and still keep
the roof up.
Thanks
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
<strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>
or for the digest to:
<strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>
Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org
 |
 |
|