Re: SB: FW: Free Energy???????

["Trkstr" <trkstr@hotmail.com>]

Hmmm, If you follow some links you can build one yourself.....then tell us
the outcome......OK?  Please??

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Willing" <willing@mb.sympatico.ca>
To: <strawbale@crest.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: SB: FW: Free Energy???????


> On 23 Apr 2002 at 23:43, Keith Rowe wrote:
>
> >     Hello Folks,
> >
> >     Me Keith. Wife Kim. Built bale house. Western Alberta. Some day
> >     bed and breakfast. Four years. Still building due to kids and
> >     life. Lots of fun. Lots of work. Lots of swearing. Beautiful. One
> >     of a kind. Tried life off the grid. Didn't work for us. No grid=no
> >     power tools. Man very sad.
>
> No, the statement is very sad.
>
> "No grid=no power tools" is not an equation.
>
> >     Anyway, that's who we are. A friend of ours sent us this web site
> >     to look at which has very interesting and far reaching
> >     implications, either as the find of the age or the hoax of the
> >     age.
> >
> >     This article claims they have created "Free energy," and have even
> >     been granted a patent for the machine that does it. (The last guy
> >     to make claims this outlandish got nailed to a cross. I suspect if
> >     the oil co's think this thing has any validity whatsoever, it's
> >     inventors will meet a similar fate, if not literally.)
> >
> >     Yeah, I know the whole term "Free Energy" is flawed. Maybe we
> >     should call it "Clean Energy" or maybe "Guilt Free Energy," or how
> >     about "Free for a Fee Energy," or maybe "Drill This Oil Boy!" or
> >     "Greenpeace Friendly Energy," then again, maybe "Kwik'n'EeZee
> >     Energy"... you get the picture.
> >
> >     Anyway, fact or fancy, check it out at
> >     http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/meg.htm.
>
> Too bad this web site doesn't even begin to provide enough information
> to base an opinion on. The abstract for the patent makes no claims with
> regard to over-unity operation. It talks about pulsing input coils and so
> on... this could be a description of a fancy transformer and nothing
> more. (Nice-looking transformer though. Full marks.)
>
> OTOH there isn't enough information here to dismiss it either. It *is*
> encouraging that we aren't entreated to invest or anything.
>
> So-called free energy schemes are fascinating, and I do try to keep an
> open mind. After all, e=mc^2 and it's implications weren't too obvious at
> one time.
>
> I once watched an hour-long tape about various zero-point energy
> schemes and was completely frustrated that, in each case, *even if we
> were to assume no smoke and mirrors*, insufficient information was
> provided to prove that there was anything useful happening at all!
>
> Then there were the super-powerful magnet guys, but that's another
> story.
>
> Yep, I keep hoping, and I keep being skeptical.
>
> Hint: next time, size your off-grid system to run the stuff you want to
run.
> All it takes is math and money. (Just in case this free energy thing
> doesn't pan out.)
>
> -=s
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
>    <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>
>
> or for the digest to:
>    <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>
>
> Please send any list administration questions to
> strawbale-owner@crest.org
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
   <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>

or for the digest to:
   <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>

Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org