REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Strawbale Archive for June 2002
241 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:43:05 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

SB: RE: RE: mistake with lime



Now I am getting confused. I think I know that Portland cement (aka concrete) is dangerous because it is caustic. I thought the lime is what makes it dangerous. If lime is not toxic, is it still dangerous?

Mark V.S. in Austin, TX

-----Original Message-----
From: Charmaine R Taylor [mailto:tms@northcoast.com]

I worked with some AmeriCorps volunteers who were about to teach
children to make hand prints with some free cement that had gotten.
Anyone who has ever seen a photo of how wet cement can peel your  skin
to the bone can imagine what could have happened with those children.

I was loud and insistent to the editors at Chelsea Green last year when
another book was coming out by a  trained architect  and natural
builder- with misinformation about lime- calling it toxic etc. they
agreed to change/edit that, but left other inaccuracies in the text.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
   <strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>

or for the digest to:
   <strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>

Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org