 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Strawbale Archive for September 2002 |
 |
| 451 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:43:32 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
SB: Re: Stucco breathability issue help
9/30/2002 9:45:10 AM, patrick.hearn@sasktel.sk.ca wrote:
> many stuccoer's... say the biggest problem is that most stucco is
>put on too thin.
>David5430@aol.com wrote:
>>Swarthmore College Strawbale House Project ...mentioned that
>>moisture is a big issue with Straw Bale construction and walls
>>that are completely sealed can hold moisture and cause
>>the straw to rot or break down. Is there a stucco that breathes so
>>this problem doesn't occur?
David;
I think that if you have a look at the report that WatJohn (aka Dr.
John Straube to non-SBHeads) did for CMHC under Don Fugler's
watchful eye (his other one having a tendency to stray ?) a couple(?)
of years ago, there will be vapour permeance/permeability numbers
for various plaster recipes. (Downloadable PDF document at:
http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/publications/en/rh-pr/tech/00-132_e.pdf
One should be aware that "breathe-ability" (or more correctly,
vapour permeance) works both ways; more vapour-permeable
plasters also allow moisture to enter the plaster (& bales) more
readily.
Rather than futz around with chemistry in an attempt to trick water
into behaving (a losing proposition IMO) a better strategy is simply to
not allow one's walls to get wet .
That being said, "moisture" is a "big issue" with most building systems
and stucco finished (conventional, non-SB) walls in particular. There
are on-going lawsuits worth $$multi-billions in the courts dealing with
this matter as we speak
Furthermore, Mr.Moisture's dear cousin, Ms. Mould, is also stepping
out to the forefront as a "big issue" in conventional building circles
these days and in this regard, one should mention that straw is an ideal
host for one of the deadliest family of moulds, the stachybotrys mob.
As to Patrick's suggestion that "thicker stucco is better" , the point is
de-bait-a-bale.
With the claddings that we use to cover our bodies, one notes that a
thin cotton shirt will dry out a lot more quickly than will a bulky cotton
sweater after a good soaking.
The downside to a thick plaster with a high moisture storage capacity
is that when the sun comes out, it is highly likely that the moisture
stored in the plaster will be driven *into* the straw rather than
cooked off (ie outwards to the atmosphere) and if the interior skin
isn't very vapour permeable, well, you know. And one should also
note that vapour permeances are cumulative.
~~~ * ~~~
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
<ArchiLogic@CHAFFyahoo.ca>
(winnow the "chaff" from my edress in your reply)
Please visit http://www.theHungerSite.com daily
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
<strawbale-unsubscribe@crest.org>
or for the digest to:
<strawbale-digest-unsubscribe@crest.org>
Please send any list administration questions to
strawbale-owner@crest.org
 |
 |
|