APPENDIX C. COST EFFECTIVENESS OF THE GREEN POWER PRICE INSURANCE PROPOSAL

The bases for the calculation of the cost-effectiveness of the proposal are set out in the following table:

Factor Assumption Basis
1 Insured capacity (MW) 1,000 Assumed terms of agreement with
participating insurance companies
2 Load factor of capacity 55% DOE projection
3 Annual green power (kWh) 4.8 billion Calculated from 1 and 2
4 Insured capacity not needing insurance (MW) 310 See text discussion
5 Capacity added by insurance (MW) 690 Calculated from 1 and 4
6 Annual additional green power (kWh) 3.3 billion Calculated from 5
7 Useful economic life of generating facilities 20 years Conservative assumption for useful
economic life.a
8 Additional green power in 20 years (kWh) 67 billion Calculated from 6 and 7
9 Maximum total cost to governments $50 million Green power price insurance proposal
10 Maximum cost per additional green kWh $0.0007 Calculated from 8 and 9
11 Minimum total cost to governments $5 million Green power price insurance proposal
12 Minimum cost per additional green kWh $0.00007 Calculated from 8 and 11

a The 20-year assumption in fact embodies two assumptions about the impact of the proposal: that the average economic life of the insured facilities would be at least 20 years (a conservative assumption), and that the facilities will continue to be additional capacity over the 20-year period. The issue involved in the second assumption is whether the additional capacity built as a result of the insurance program is merely “borrowed” from future construction. Suppose that capacity that would have been built in, say, six years was instead built now as a result of the availability of green power price insurance. The insurance then would add to green generating capacity but would do so only for a six-year period and not for the full economic life of the facilities. The analysis in this paper assumes that the construction is not borrowed from the future in this sense. For at least 20 years, the insurance is assumed to shift the growth of green generating capacity to a higher trend line.
Back Up

Back to Footnote 25
Back to Part IV
Back to Footnote 37

Table of Contents Previous section Next section