The bases for the calculation of the cost-effectiveness of the proposal are set out in the following table:
| Factor | Assumption | Basis | |
| 1 | Insured capacity (MW) | 1,000 |
Assumed terms of agreement with participating insurance companies |
| 2 | Load factor of capacity | 55% | DOE projection |
| 3 | Annual green power (kWh) | 4.8 billion | Calculated from 1 and 2 |
| 4 | Insured capacity not needing insurance (MW) | 310 | See text discussion |
| 5 | Capacity added by insurance (MW) | 690 | Calculated from 1 and 4 |
| 6 | Annual additional green power (kWh) | 3.3 billion | Calculated from 5 |
| 7 | Useful economic life of generating facilities | 20 years |
Conservative assumption for useful economic life.a |
| 8 | Additional green power in 20 years (kWh) | 67 billion | Calculated from 6 and 7 |
| 9 | Maximum total cost to governments | $50 million | Green power price insurance proposal |
| 10 | Maximum cost per additional green kWh | $0.0007 | Calculated from 8 and 9 |
| 11 | Minimum total cost to governments | $5 million | Green power price insurance proposal |
| 12 | Minimum cost per additional green kWh | $0.00007 | Calculated from 8 and 11 |
a
The 20-year assumption in fact embodies two assumptions about the impact of the proposal: that the average economic life of the
insured facilities would be at least 20 years (a conservative assumption), and that the facilities will continue to be additional capacity
over the 20-year period. The issue involved in the second assumption is whether the additional capacity built as a result of the
insurance program is merely “borrowed” from future construction. Suppose that capacity that would have been built in, say, six years
was instead built now as a result of the availability of green power price insurance. The insurance then would add to green generating
capacity but would do so only for a six-year period and not for the full economic life of the facilities. The analysis in this paper
assumes that the construction is not borrowed from the future in this sense. For at least 20 years, the insurance is assumed to shift the
growth of green generating capacity to a higher trend line.
Back Up
Back to Footnote 25
Back to Part IV
Back to Footnote 37