Utility-scale geothermal power production
employs three main technologies. These are
known as dry steam, flash steam and binary
cycle systems. The technology employed depends
on the temperature and pressure of the geothermal
reservoir. Unlike solar, wind, and hydro-based
renewable power, geothermal power plant operation
is independent of fluctuations in daily and
seasonal weather.
Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Flash
steam
Flash steam power plants use hot water (>360
ºF, or >182 ºC) from the geothermal
reservoir.15 When the water is
pumped to the generator, it is released from
the pressure of the deep reservoir. The sudden
drop in pressure causes some of the water
to vaporize to steam, which spins a turbine
to generate electricity. Both dry steam and
flash steam power plants emit small amounts
of carbon dioxide, nitric oxide, and sulfur,
but generally 50 times less than traditional
fossil-fuel power plants.16 Hot
water not flashed into steam is returned to
the geothermal reservoir through injection
wells. Figure 3 is a schematic of a typical
flash steam power plant.17
Binary-cycle
Binary-cycle power plants use moderate-temperature
water (225 ºF–360 ºF, or 107
ºC–182 ºC) from the geothermal
reservoir. In binary systems, hot geothermal
fluids are passed through one side of a heat
exchanger to heat a working fluid in a separate
adjacent pipe. The working fluid, usually
an organic compound with a low boiling point
such as Iso-butane or Iso-pentane, is vaporized
and passed through a turbine to generate electricity.
An ammonia-water working fluid is also used
in what is known as the Kalina Cycle. Makers
claim that the Kalina Cycle system boosts
geothermal plant efficiency by 20–40
percent and reduces plant construction costs
by 20–30 percent, thereby lowering the
cost of geothermal power generation.
Figure
4. Binary Cycle Power Plant Schematic
Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL)
The advantages of binary cycle systems are
that the working fluid boils at a lower temperature
than water does, so electricity can be generated
from reservoirs with lower temperature, and
the binary cycle system is self-contained
and therefore, produces virtually no emissions.
For these reasons, some geothermal experts
believe binary cycle systems could be the
dominant geothermal power plants of the future.
Figure 4 is a schematic of a typical binary
cycle power plant.18
Geothermal
Power Generation
As of 2000, approximately 8,000 megawatts
(MW) of geothermal electrical generating capacity
was present in more than 20 countries, led
by the United States, Philippines, Italy,
Mexico, and Indonesia (see Table 2 below).
This represents 0.25% of worldwide installed
electrical generation capacity. In the United
States, geothermal power capacity was 2,228
MW, or approximately 10% of non-hydro renewable
generating capacity in 2001 (see Figure 5
below).19 This capacity would meet the electricity
needs of approximately 1.7 million U.S. households.20
Current geothermal use is only a fraction
of the total potential of geothermal energy.
U.S. geothermal resources alone are estimated
at 70,000,000 quads21 , equivalent to 750,000-years
of total primary energy supply (TPES) for
the entire nation at current rates of consumption.
The geothermal energy potential in the uppermost
6 miles of the Earth’s crust amounts
to 50,000 times the energy of all known oil
and gas resources in the world.22 Not all of
these resources are technologically or economically
accessible, but tapping into even a fraction
of this potential could provide significant
renewable resources for years to come. The
Geothermal Energy Association reports the
potential for developing an additional 23,000
MW of generating capacity in the United States
using conventional geothermal energy technology.23
Table 2. Installed Geothermal Generating
Capacities Worldwide 24
Country
1995 (MWe)
2000 (MWe)
Country
1995 (MWe)
2000 (MWe)
United States
2,817
2,228
Kenya
45
45
Philippines
1,227
1,909
Guatemala
33
33
Italy
632
785
China
29
29
Mexico
753
755
Russia
11
23
Indonesia
310
590
Turkey
20
20
Japan
414
547
Portugal
5
16
New Zealand
286
437
Ethiopia
0
8
Iceland
50
170
France
4
4
El Salvador
105
161
Thailand
0.3
0.3
Costa Rica
55
142
Australia
0.2
0.2
Nicaragua
70
70 Argentina
0.7
0
Total (MW)
6,833
7,974
Figure 5. U.S. Nonhydro Renewable
Power Generating Capacity, 2001
Source: EIA Renewable Energy
Annual 2001. Biomass excludes agriculture
byproducts/crops, sludge waste, tires, and
other biomass solids, liquids, and gases.
Capacity
Factor
The percentage of time a power plant runs
is the plants capacity factor . Geothermal
power plants typically produce electricity
about 90% of the time, though can be run up
to 98% of the time if the contract price of
power is high enough to justify increased
operational and maintenance costs. In comparison,
coal-fired power plants are typically run
65–75% of the time, while nuclear plants
in the United States have run at very high
capacity factors (95–98%) in recent
years due to lucrative market and regulatory
conditions.
Endnotes
12. Energy & Geoscience Institute at the
University of Utah. Geothermal Energy
Brochure.
http://www.egi.utah.edu/geothermal/GeothermalBrochure.pdf ;
accessed Oct 1, 2002.
13. U.S. Department of Energy: Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
http://www.eren.doe.gov/geothermal/geopowerplants.html ;
accessed Sep 25, 2002.
14. National Renewable Energy Laboratory:
Geothermal Technologies Program. http://www.nrel.gov/geothermal/geoelectricity.html ;
accessed June 5, 2003. http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/renewable/geothermal.html .
15. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory. http://geothermal.id.doe.gov/what-is.shtml ;
accessed Sep 25, 2002.
16. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
http://www.nrel.gov/geothermal ;
accessed Sep 25, 2002.
17. National Renewable Energy Laboratory:
Geothermal Technologies Program. http://www.nrel.gov/geothermal/geoelectricity.html ;
accessed June 5, 2003.
18. National Renewable Energy Laboratory:
Geothermal Technologies Program. http://www.nrel.gov/geothermal/geoelectricity.html ;
accessed June 5, 2003.
19. Energy Information Administration. Renewable
Energy Annual 2001. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/rea_data/table5.html ;
accessed Jan. 28, 2003.
20. This figure assumes a capacity factor
of 90% and an annual average household electricity
consumption of 10,200 kWh as reported by DOE’s
EIA for 1997.
21. A quad is one quadrillion (1 x 1015 )
British Thermal Units (BTU). One BTU equals
0.293 watt-hours.
22. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy. http://www.eren.doe.gov/state_energy/technology_overview.cfm?techid=5 ;
accessed Sep 30, 2002.
23. Geothermal Energy Association. Geothermal
Electric Production Potential. Based Upon
U.S. Geologic Survey Testimony Before the
Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources
of the House Resources Committee, U.S. House
of Representatives, May 3, 2001, and other
sources. http://www.geo-energy.org/UsResources.htm ;
accessed January 28, 2003.
24. International Geothermal Association.
Installed Generating Capacity. http://iga.igg.cnr.it/electricitygeneration.php ;
accessed Jan 28, 2003.